<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Content Strategy Noob &#187; Content Management</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/category/content-management/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com</link>
	<description>Content Strategy...Huh? (by @rsgracey)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 26 Aug 2011 18:00:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Trouble with Semantic Markup: Response to schema.org</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/06/04/the-trouble-with-semantic-markup-response-to-schema-org/</link>
		<comments>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/06/04/the-trouble-with-semantic-markup-response-to-schema-org/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jun 2011 13:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rsgracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Information Architecture]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=291</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The quest for the Semantic Web has a new route: schema.org. Here's why we can't hope for much from this approach.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/06/04/the-trouble-with-semantic-markup-response-to-schema-org/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Content Modeling is more than “fields”</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/05/04/content-modeling-is-more-than-fields/</link>
		<comments>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/05/04/content-modeling-is-more-than-fields/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 May 2011 16:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rsgracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Modeling]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=247</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content modeling should be more a part of design than development. When your CMS team comes looking for template requirements, be sure you've spent time "modeling" before creating the "model."]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2011/05/04/content-modeling-is-more-than-fields/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Sophie’s choice: Well-crafted content or empowered content owners?</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/05/06/sophie%e2%80%99s-choice-well-crafted-content-or-empowered-content-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/05/06/sophie%e2%80%99s-choice-well-crafted-content-or-empowered-content-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 May 2010 20:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rsgracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Crafting web content is a discipline, expertise, and a whole set of skills. Content owners are subject matter experts and may not have the content expertise to make successful content.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/05/06/sophie%e2%80%99s-choice-well-crafted-content-or-empowered-content-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Mythic Bestiary: Content Owners</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/03/29/the-mythic-bestiary-content-owners/</link>
		<comments>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/03/29/the-mythic-bestiary-content-owners/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 17:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rsgracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=132</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever seen a real content owner? Was it all that legend says it should be...?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2010/03/29/the-mythic-bestiary-content-owners/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>You’ll Wish You’d Had a Content Strategy Before Implementing Content Management</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/05/28/you%e2%80%99ll-wish-you%e2%80%99d-had-a-content-strategy-before-implementing-content-management/</link>
		<comments>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/05/28/you%e2%80%99ll-wish-you%e2%80%99d-had-a-content-strategy-before-implementing-content-management/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 12:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>rsgracey</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Content Management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Content Strategy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CMS]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Content Strategy helps define the technical requirements for your Content Management System: Not having a content strategy dooms your CMS.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/05/28/you%e2%80%99ll-wish-you%e2%80%99d-had-a-content-strategy-before-implementing-content-management/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

