<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Content Strategy Divination: A Woolly Discipline?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/04/02/content-strategy-divination-a-woolly-discipline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/04/02/content-strategy-divination-a-woolly-discipline/</link>
	<description>Content Strategy...Huh? (by @rsgracey)</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 28 Jun 2010 18:07:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Content Strategy Noob &#187; Description Versus Evaluation in Assessing Content Quality</title>
		<link>http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/2009/04/02/content-strategy-divination-a-woolly-discipline/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>The Content Strategy Noob &#187; Description Versus Evaluation in Assessing Content Quality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:06:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://contentstrategy.rsgracey.com/?p=36#comment-12</guid>
		<description>[...] idea is related closely to my previous post on Content Strategy Divination, but it addresses more directly the content types on the website under [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] idea is related closely to my previous post on Content Strategy Divination, but it addresses more directly the content types on the website under [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
